Johnson v. Garman et al
| Sir Anthony Johnson |
| Mark Garman and PA State Attorney General |
| 3:2018cv02032 |
| October 18, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| DB |
| Malachy E Mannion |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ELECTION by Sir Anthony Johnson. (bg) |
| Filing 6 ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER with Notice of Limitations on Filing of Future Petitions Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254.Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 12/3/18. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Election)(bs) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Sir Anthony Johnson.(bg) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Anthony Johnson.(bg) Modified on 11/15/2018 (lp). Inmate Statement Attached.. |
| Filing 3 THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER directing the petitioner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed by LP on 10/22/2018. (Attachments: #1 IFP (Habeas Corpus))(lp) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED (bg) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by Anthony Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law)(bg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
