Marsicano v. Rehrig Penn Logistics, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Joseph Marsicano
Defendant: Rehrig Pacific Company and Rehrig Penn Logistics, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2018cv02065
Filed: October 24, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: A Richard Caputo
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 21, 2018 Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint by Rehrig Pacific Company, Rehrig Penn Logistics, Inc..(Wynn, Matthew)
October 31, 2018 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew R Olcese on behalf of Joseph Marsicano (Olcese, Andrew)
October 31, 2018 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Timothy S Seiler on behalf of Joseph Marsicano (Seiler, Timothy)
October 29, 2018 Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned by Joseph Marsicano. Rehrig Pacific Company waiver sent on 10/24/2018, answer due 12/24/2018; Rehrig Penn Logistics, Inc. waiver sent on 10/24/2018, answer due 12/24/2018. (Karpf, Ari)
October 29, 2018 Filing 6 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO FRCP 7.1 by Rehrig Pacific Company identifying Corporate Parent Rehrig Pacific Holdings, Inc. for Rehrig Pacific Company. (Wynn, Matthew)
October 29, 2018 Filing 5 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO FRCP 7.1 by Rehrig Penn Logistics, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Rehrig Pacific Holdings, Inc. for Rehrig Penn Logistics, Inc.. (Wynn, Matthew)
October 29, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew S. Wynn on behalf of All Defendants (Wynn, Matthew)
October 29, 2018 DOCKET ANNOTATION: Doc. 4 deleted and redocketed as Doc. 6 (bg)
October 24, 2018 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Rehrig Pacific Company, Rehrig Penn Logistics, Inc. and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve them with the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (ep)
October 24, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Rehrig Pacific Company, Rehrig Penn Logistics, Inc. ( Filing fee $400, Receipt Number 4580287), filed by Joseph Marsicano. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ep)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marsicano v. Rehrig Penn Logistics, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rehrig Pacific Company
Represented By: Matthew S. Wynn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rehrig Penn Logistics, Inc.
Represented By: Matthew S. Wynn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Marsicano
Represented By: Ari R. Karpf
Represented By: Andrew R Olcese
Represented By: Timothy S Seiler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?