Moran v. United Services Automobile Association (USAA)
Lauren Antidormi Moran |
United Services Automobile Association (USAA) |
3:2018cv02085 |
October 26, 2018 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
A Richard Caputo |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). #2 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Count II of the Complaint is GRANTED. Plaintiff's bad faith claim in Count II of the Complaint is dismissed without prejudice to Plaintiff filing an amended complaint within 21 days of the date of entry of this Order to plead a plausible bad faith claim. Failure to timely file an amended complaint will result in the dismissal of the bad faith claim with prejudice.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 12/12/18. (dw) |
Filing 8 MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry) re #2 MOTION to Dismiss Count II of Plaintiff's Complaint - Bad Faith filed by United Services Automobile Association (USAA). Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 12/12/18. (dw) |
Filing 7 REPLY BRIEF re #2 MOTION to Dismiss Count II of Plaintiff's Complaint - Bad Faith filed by United Services Automobile Association (USAA).(Alford, Brigid) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Allison L Krupp on behalf of United Services Automobile Association (USAA). (Krupp, Allison) |
Filing 5 BRIEF IN OPPOSITION re #2 MOTION to Dismiss Count II of Plaintiff's Complaint - Bad Faith -Plaintiff's Brief in Opposition to Defendants Motion filed by Lauren Antidormi Moran.(Goffer, Michael) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Petition for Removal with Jury Demand by Lauren Antidormi Moran.(Goffer, Michael) |
Filing 3 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #2 MOTION to Dismiss Count II of Plaintiff's Complaint - Bad Faith filed by United Services Automobile Association (USAA).(Alford, Brigid) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Dismiss Count II of Plaintiff's Complaint - Bad Faith by United Services Automobile Association (USAA). (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Alford, Brigid) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by United Services Automobile Association (USAA) from Court of Common Pleas of Lackawanna County, Pennsylvania, case number 5162-CV-20198. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 4584030), filed by United Services Automobile Association (USAA). (Attachments: #1 Exhibits Table of Contents, #2 Exhibits A and B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(ep) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Moran v. United Services Automobile Association (USAA) | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Lauren Antidormi Moran | |
Represented By: | Michael R. Goffer |
Represented By: | Michael R Goffer |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: United Services Automobile Association (USAA) | |
Represented By: | Brigid Q. Alford |
Represented By: | Allison L Krupp |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.