Rhine v. Liberty Mutual Assurance Company of Boston
Charles Rhine |
Liberty Mutual Assurance Company of Boston |
3:2018cv02459 |
December 31, 2018 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Robert D Mariani |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER DISMISSING CASE without costs and without prejudice to the right of either party, upon good cause shown within sixty (60) days, to reinstate the action if settlement is not consummated.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 2/14/19. (jam) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Settlement Ltr RE Case Settled by Charles Rhine (Fiorillo, Michael) |
Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint & Summons Proof of Service served on Liberty Mutual on January 7, 2019, filed by Charles Rhine. (Fiorillo, Michael) |
Filing 6 Order accepting #4 Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead. Defendant shall have until 2/15/19 to file and serve a written response to Plaintif's Complaint. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 1/15/19. (jam) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Liberty Mutual Assurance Company of Boston identifying Corporate Parent The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, Corporate Parent Lincoln National Corporation for Liberty Mutual Assurance Company of Boston.. (Silver, Steven) |
Filing 4 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint to Extend Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead by Liberty Mutual Assurance Company of Boston. (Silver, Steven) |
Filing 3 LETTER ORDER Re: Case Assignment and Procedures. You are directed to file a written report within 30 days as to whether service has been effected or a waiver of service obtained. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 1/2/19. (jam) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Liberty Mutual Assurance Company of Boston and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve them with the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (ep) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Liberty Mutual Assurance Company of Boston ( Filing fee $400, Receipt Number 4635077), filed by Charles Rhine. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(ep) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Rhine v. Liberty Mutual Assurance Company of Boston | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Liberty Mutual Assurance Company of Boston | |
Represented By: | Steven Silver |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Charles Rhine | |
Represented By: | Michael J. Fiorillo |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.