Preski v. Shaprio et al
| Brian J. Preski |
| PA State Attorney General, Joshua David Shaprio, Chad Libby and Dauphin County Probation Services |
| 3:2019cv00288 |
| February 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| A Richard Caputo |
| Martin C Carlson |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER - Respondents, on or before May 13, 2019, shall file an initial response to the petition for writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner may, if the Petitioner so desires, file a reply to the response within fourteen (14) days of the filing of the response or no later than May 27, 2019. 4. All documents filed by the parties and by the Court shall be served upon the District Attorney for Dauphin County and the Office of Attorney General. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on April 16, 2019. (kjn)
|
| Filing 2 EXHIBITS 1-14 by Brian J. Preski re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 2, #2 Exhibit(s) 3, #3 Exhibit(s) 4, #4 Exhibit(s) 5, #5 Exhibit(s) 6, #6 Exhibit(s) 7, #7 Exhibit(s) 8, #8 Exhibit(s) 9, #9 Exhibit(s) 10, #10 Exhibit(s) 11, #11 Exhibit(s) 12, #12 Exhibit(s) 13, #13 Exhibit(s) 14)(ao) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $5, Receipt Number 0314-4678800), filed by Brian J. Preski.(ao) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
