Peleayz v. Doll
| Augustine Peleayz and Lorenzo Lopez |
| Warden Clair Doll |
| 3:2019cv00320 |
| February 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| PT |
| A Richard Caputo |
| Naturalization Application |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 5/16/2019.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 4/25/2019. (bg)
|
| DOCKET ANNOTATION: Copy of the Petition (No. 1) mailed to the Warden of York County Correctional Facility and the United States Attorney along with Order dated 4/25/2019. (bg) |
| Receipt of payment from AUGUSTINE PELEAYZ in the amount of $5.00 for WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. Transaction posted on 3/22/2019. Receipt number 333064976 processed by epetrosk. (jjs, ) |
| Filing 4 RECEIPT LETTER $ 5.00, receipt number 333064976 Petitioner Filing Fee 3/22/2019. ***THE PETITION IS NOW DEEMED FILED*** (bg) |
| Filing 3 THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER directing the petitioner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed by LP on 02/27/2019. (Attachments: #1 IFP (Habeas Corpus))(lp) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED w/ Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (ao) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Augustine Peleayz.(ao) Modified on 3/22/2019 (bg). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
