Parr v. Berryhill
| Clarence L. Parr |
| Nancy A. Berryhill |
| 3:2019cv00870 |
| May 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Karoline Mehalchick |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 CONSENT FORM SENT (For Direct Assignment Cases to Magistrate Judges) to Nancy A. Berryhill, Clarence L. Parr YOU MUST SAVE THIS FORM TO YOUR DESKTOP. THEN OPEN THE SAVED FORM AND COMPLETE THE REQUIRED SECTIONS. DO NOT FILE THIS FORM IN THE CLERKS OFFICE. THE FORM MUST BE E-MAILED TO consents@pamd.uscourts.gov OR IF YOU ARE NOT AN ECF REGISTERED USER, THEN MAIL THE FORM TO Clerks Administrative Assistant, Clerks Office, P.O. Box 1148, Scranton, PA 18501-1148. Consent Form due by 8/16/2019 (Attachments: #1 Defense Consent Form) (cw) |
| Filing 8 Transcript from the Social Security Administration of entire record of proceedings.. (Attachments: #1 Index, #2 docs related to admin process, #3 pmt docs, #4 jurisdictional docs, #5 non-disability related, #6 disability related, #7 medical records - part 1, #8 medical records - part 2, #9 medical records - part 3, #10 medical records - part 4, #11 medical records - part 5, #12 medical records - part 6, #13 medical records - part 7)(Dalke, Samuel) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by Nancy A. Berryhill.(Dalke, Samuel) |
| Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to #5 Summons and Complaint served as to AUSA and rec'd on 6/17/19. (ao) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Nancy A. Berryhill and provided TO U.S. MARSHAL for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve them with the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (cw) |
Filing 4
ORDER DIRECTING U.S. MARSHAL TO SERVE SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT ; granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karoline Mehalchick on 5/22/2019. (cw)
|
| Filing 3 STANDING PRACTICE ORDER 13-9 in Social Security Appeals (ep) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Clarence L. Parr.(ep) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nancy A. Berryhill lodged pending the disposition of the Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed by Clarence L. Parr. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ep) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Parr v. Berryhill | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Clarence L. Parr | |
| Represented By: | David C. Raker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill | |
| Represented By: | Samuel S. Dalke |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
