Gilbert v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Chyna Gilbert
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 3:2019cv01286
Filed: July 24, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: Joseph F Saporito
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 19, 2019 Filing 8 SPECIAL ADMISSIONS FORM APPROVED as to Peter A. GortonSigned by Magistrate Judge Joseph F. Saporito, Jr on 8/19/19. (ms)
August 16, 2019 Filing 7 RETURN OF SERVICE of Summons & Complaint served on the U.S. Attorney's Office in Scranton, PA on 8/1/19 (ga)
August 16, 2019 DOCKET ANNOTATION: Attorney Gorton is verified and is in good standing. (ga)
July 25, 2019 Filing 6 PETITION FOR SPECIAL ADMISSION (PRO HAC VICE) by Peter A. Gorton on behalf of Chyna Gilbert Attorney Peter Gorton is seeking special admission. Filing fee $ 50, receipt number 0314-4826031.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Code of Professional Conduct, #2 Exhibit(s) Letter to Judge Saporito)(Gorton, Peter)
July 25, 2019 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security and provided TO U.S. MARSHAL for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve them with the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (ga)
July 25, 2019 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security and provided TO U.S. MARSHAL for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve them with the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (ga)
July 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER DIRECTING U.S. MARSHAL TO SERVE SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT ; granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. COMPLAINT IS NOW DEEMED FILED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph F. Saporito, Jr on 7/26/19. (ms)
July 25, 2019 DOCKET ANNOTATION: Per Order of Court dated 7/25/19, Summons, Order, and Complaint have been sent to the U.S. Marshal for service. (ga)
July 24, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Chyna Gilbert.(ga)
July 24, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security lodged pending the disposition of the Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed by Chyna Gilbert. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ga)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gilbert v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chyna Gilbert
Represented By: Peter A. Gorton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?