Carpio-Santiago v. Tice et al
Petitioner: Juan Carpio-Santiago
Respondent: Eric Tice and Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro
Case Number: 3:2019cv01407
Filed: August 14, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: Joseph F Saporito
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER pursuant to U.S. v Miller and Mason v Meyers - withn 45 days of the date of this Order petitioner shall complete and file with the court the attached notice of election.Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph F. Saporito, Jr on 9/6/19. (ms)
September 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE- The petitioner is therefore ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE, within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, why the petition should not be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2244(d). See Rule 4, 28 U.S.C. foll. 2254; Day v. McDonough, 547 U.S. 198, 210 (2006); United States v. Bendolph, 409 F.3d 155, 16465 & n.15 (3d Cir. 2005). The petitioner is invited to submit any documentation he may have to demonstrate that this petition was filed within the applicable period of limitation. The petitioner may also submit support for any argument that the statute of limitations does not apply to this petition, or that the period of limitation was tolled in a manner that makes this petition timely. Show Cause Response due by 10/7/2019.Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph F. Saporito, Jr on 9/6/19. (ms)
September 4, 2019 Receipt of payment from JUAN CARPIO SANTIAGO in the amount of $5.00 for WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. Transaction posted on 9/3/2019. Receipt number 333067297 processed by epetrosk. (jjs)
September 3, 2019 Filing 4 Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number 333067297. Petition is now deemed FILED. (kpf)
August 14, 2019 Filing 3 THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER directing the petitioner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed by LP on 08/14/2019. (Attachments: #1 IFP (habeas corpus))(lp)
August 14, 2019 Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED w/ Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent) (lp)
August 14, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by Juan Carpio-Santiago.(lp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carpio-Santiago v. Tice et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Eric Tice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Juan Carpio-Santiago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?