Hassel v. Saul
| Mary Catherine Hassel |
| Andrew M. Saul |
| 3:2019cv01981 |
| November 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Karoline Mehalchick |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Mary Catherine Hassel. (Chermol, David) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Mary Catherine Hassel. (Chermol, David) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Mary Catherine Hassel. Andrew M. Saul served on 11/29/2019, answer due 1/28/2020. (Chermol, David) |
| Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint served on the U.S. Attorney on 12/6/19 (ga) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Andrew M. Saul and provided TO U.S. MARSHAL for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve them with the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (cw) |
Filing 4
ORDER DIRECTING U.S. MARSHAL TO SERVE SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT ; granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. AND NOW, this 20th day of November, 2019, the plaintiff having filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma paupers, (Doc. 2), IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The plaintiffs request to proceed in forma pauperis, (Doc. 2) is GRANTED. 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to issue process to the United States Marshal who is directed to service plaintiffs complaint in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4(I) within fourteen (14) days of the date of the order granting the application to proceed in forma pauperis. (LR 83.40.2). 3. All parties shall comply with the Standing Practice Order (Doc. 3) entered by the Court. 4. The complaint (Doc. 1) is now deemed filed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karoline Mehalchick on 11/20/2019. (cw)
|
|
Filing 3
STANDING PRACTICE ORDER 13-9 in Social Security AppealsSigned by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 12/11/13. (ga)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Mary Catherine Hassel.(ga) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul lodged pending the disposition of the Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed by Mary Catherine Hassel. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ga) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hassel v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew M. Saul | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mary Catherine Hassel | |
| Represented By: | David F Chermol |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
