Kansky v. City of Wilkes-Barre et al
Plaintiff: Lawrence J. Kansky
Defendant: Richard Harding, Joseph Coffay and City of Wilkes-Barre
Case Number: 3:2020cv00043
Filed: January 9, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: Malachy E Mannion
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER Presently before the court is plaintiffs amended complaint. (Doc. 14) Based upon this filing, the defendants motion to dismiss (Doc. 10) is DISMISSED without prejudice.dismissing #10 .Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 3/5/20 (bs)
March 4, 2020 Filing 14 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Lawrence J. Kansky.(Pollick, Cynthia)
March 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 SCHEDULING ORDER: Case Management Conference set for 3/25/2020 11:00 AM before Honorable Malachy E Mannion.Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 3/2/20. (bs)
February 28, 2020 Filing 12 APPENDIX by City of Wilkes-Barre, Joseph Coffay, Richard Harding. to #10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) June 26, 2019 Citizens' Voice article, #2 Exhibit(s) September 12, 2019 Citizens' Voice article, #3 Exhibit(s) July 2, 2019 Citizens' Voice article)(Dean, John)
February 28, 2020 Filing 11 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by City of Wilkes-Barre, Joseph Coffay, Richard Harding. (Attachments: #1 Unpublished Opinion(s))(Dean, John)
February 28, 2020 Filing 10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by City of Wilkes-Barre, Joseph Coffay, Richard Harding. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Nonconcurrence)(Dean, John)
February 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 deftss' Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. Defts' br. in supp. of their mot. to dismiss & ptlf's br. in oppos. to mot. to dismiss shall not exceed 8,500 words.Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 2/21/20 (bs)
February 20, 2020 Filing 8 Consent MOTION to Exceed Page Limitation and Word County Requirement for Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss by City of Wilkes-Barre, Joseph Coffay, Richard Harding. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Concurrence)(Dean, John)
January 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER Re: Case Assignment and Procedures.Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 1/16/20. (bs)
January 16, 2020 Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned by Lawrence J. Kansky. All Defendants. (Pollick, Cynthia)
January 15, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Mark W. Bufalino on behalf of City of Wilkes-Barre, Joseph Coffay, Richard Harding. (Bufalino, Mark)
January 15, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by John G. Dean on behalf of City of Wilkes-Barre, Joseph Coffay, Richard Harding. (Dean, John)
January 13, 2020 Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lawrence J. Kansky. All Defendants. (Pollick, Cynthia)
January 13, 2020 DOCKET ANNOTATION: document 3 was deleted -Counsel to re-file (cl)
January 10, 2020 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve them with the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (kpf)
January 10, 2020 Senior Judge James M. Munley has recused and has directed that this matter be reassigned. (kpf)
January 10, 2020 DOCKET ANNOTATION: This case has been assigned to Judge Malachy E. Mannion. (kpf)
January 9, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $400, Receipt Number 4973706), filed by Lawrence J. Kansky. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(kpf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kansky v. City of Wilkes-Barre et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard Harding
Represented By: Mark W. Bufalino
Represented By: John G. Dean
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joseph Coffay
Represented By: Mark W. Bufalino
Represented By: John G. Dean
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Wilkes-Barre
Represented By: Mark W. Bufalino
Represented By: John G. Dean
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lawrence J. Kansky
Represented By: Cynthia L. Pollick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?