Hodge v. Suisse First Boston Armt 2005-19
| Karen Headley Hodge |
| Suisse First Boston Armt 2005-19 |
| 3:2020cv00383 |
| March 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Robert D Mariani |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
Order approving Stipulation extending the time for Defendant Adjustable Rate Mortgage Trust 2005-10, Adjustable Rate Mortgage-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-10, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, incorrectly named as Suisse First Boston ARMT 2005-10 (Defendant), to Answer or to Otherwise Move as to Plaintiffs Complaint to include May 13, 2020. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 4/14/20. (jam)
|
| Filing 7 Corrective Order to Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer or Otherwise Move as to Plaintiff's Complaint by Suisse First Boston Armt 2005-19. (Seiden, Stuart) Modified on 4/10/2020 (ao). |
|
Filing 6
Order approving re #5 Stipulation extending time. The time for Defendant Adjustable RateMortgage Trust 2005-10, Adjustable Rate Mortgage-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series2005-10, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, incorrectly named as Suisse First BostonARMT 2005-10 (Defendant), to Answer or to Otherwise Move as to Plaintiffs Complaint is extended to and including April 13, 2020. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 4/10/20. (jam)
|
| Filing 5 STIPULATION and Proposed Order to Extend Time to Answer or Otherwise Move as to Plaintiff's Complaint by Suisse First Boston Armt 2005-19, filed by Suisse First Boston Armt 2005-19. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Seiden, Stuart) |
|
Filing 4
Order approving re #3 Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer or Otherwise Move as to Plaintiff's Complaint. Time extended to 4/13/20. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 3/13/20. (jam)
|
| Filing 3 STIPULATION and Proposed Order to Extend Time to Answer or Otherwise Move as to Plaintiff's Complaint by Suisse First Boston Armt 2005-19, filed by Suisse First Boston Armt 2005-19.(Seiden, Stuart) |
| Filing 2 LETTER ORDER Re: Case Assignment and Procedures. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 3/9/20. (jam) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Suisse First Boston Armt 2005-19 from Court of Common Pleas of Wayne County, case number 39-Civil-2020. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0314-5028285), filed by Suisse First Boston Armt 2005-19. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ao) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hodge v. Suisse First Boston Armt 2005-19 | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Karen Headley Hodge | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey Stephen Treat |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Suisse First Boston Armt 2005-19 | |
| Represented By: | Stuart I. Seiden |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
