Taylor v. Superintendent of FCI-Hazleton
Petitioner: Stephani Taylor
Respondent: Superintendent of FCI-Hazleton
Case Number: 3:2020cv00726
Filed: April 30, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Scranton Office
Presiding Judge: Malachy E Mannion
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 1, 2020 DOCKET ANNOTATION: Case transferred from Pennsylvania Middle has been opened in Northern District of West Virginia as case 5:20-cv-00089, filed 05/01/2020. (jw)
April 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) Based on the courts memorandum issued this same day, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:(1) The defendant Stephani Taylors letter Motion for Immediate Release to Home Confinement, (Doc. 80), is construed as an emergency petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241.(2) The clerk of court is directed to docket Taylors Doc. 80 motion as a 2241 habeas petition and to assign it a separate civil number. Due to the immediate request for relief sought, the clerk of court is directed forgo the thirty-day administrative order requiring Taylor to pay the filing fee for a habeas petition, as that can be addressed in the proper jurisdictional court.(3) The clerk of court is then directed to forthwith transfer Taylors habeas petition to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia.(4) To the extent Taylors Doc. 80 motion could be alternatively construed as a motion for compassionate release, it is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of jurisdiction since she has failed to comply with 3582(c)(1)(A)s exhaustion requirement.(5) To the extent Taylors Doc. 80 motion could be alternatively construed as a motion for immediate release to home confinement under the CARES Act, it is DISMISSED since the court lacks authority to grant such relief under the Act.s/ Malachy E. Mannion MALACHY E. MANNIONUnited States District JudgeDATE: April 30, 2020 Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 04/30/2020. (lp)
April 30, 2020 Filing 3 MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry)Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 04/30/2020. (lp)
April 30, 2020 Filing 2 Government's Brief in Opposition to Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus for compassionate release by Superintendent of FCI-Hazleton.(lp)
April 30, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Compassionate Release lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by Stephani Taylor.(lp)
April 30, 2020 DOCKET ANNOTATION: Case electronically transferred to the Northern District of West Virginia. (ao)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Taylor v. Superintendent of FCI-Hazleton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Stephani Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Superintendent of FCI-Hazleton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?