Pehowic v. Saul

Plaintiff: Brandon Joseph Pehowic
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Case Number: 3:2020cv01073
Filed: June 25, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: Robert D Mariani
Referring Judge: Joseph F Saporito
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 10, 2020 VERBAL ORDER REASSIGNING Case Case reassigned to Honorable Robert D. Mariani and referred to Magistrate Judge Joseph F. Saporito, Jr as one or more parties have not consented to the jurisdiction of a U.S. Magistrate Judge. (jkc)
July 30, 2020 Filing 9 CONSENT FORM SENT (For Direct Assignment Cases to Magistrate Judges) to Andrew M. Saul YOU MUST SAVE THIS FORM TO YOUR DESKTOP. THEN OPEN THE SAVED FORM AND COMPLETE THE REQUIRED SECTIONS. DO NOT FILE THIS FORM IN THE CLERKS OFFICE. THE FORM MUST BE E-MAILED TO consents@pamd.uscourts.gov OR IF YOU ARE NOT AN ECF REGISTERED USER, THEN MAIL THE FORM TO Clerks Administrative Assistant, Clerks Office, P.O. Box 1148, Scranton, PA 18501-1148. Consent Form due by 8/31/2020 (ms)
July 30, 2020 Filing 8 CONSENT FORM SENT (For Direct Assignment Cases to Magistrate Judges) to Brandon Joseph Pehowic YOU MUST SAVE THIS FORM TO YOUR DESKTOP. THEN OPEN THE SAVED FORM AND COMPLETE THE REQUIRED SECTIONS. DO NOT FILE THIS FORM IN THE CLERKS OFFICE. THE FORM MUST BE E-MAILED TO consents@pamd.uscourts.gov OR IF YOU ARE NOT AN ECF REGISTERED USER, THEN MAIL THE FORM TO Clerks Administrative Assistant, Clerks Office, P.O. Box 1148, Scranton, PA 18501-1148. Consent Form due by 8/31/2020 (ms)
July 29, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Samuel S Dalke on behalf of Andrew M. Saul. (Dalke, Samuel)
July 29, 2020 Filing 6 Summons Returned Executed as to the US Attorney on 7/27/2020. (bg)
June 26, 2020 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Andrew M. Saul and provided TO U.S. MARSHAL for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Attachments: #1 USM 285 Service Form) (ep)
June 26, 2020 Filing 4 ORDER DIRECTING U.S. MARSHAL TO SERVE SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT ; granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. COMPLAINT IS NOW DEEMED FILED.Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph F. Saporito, Jr on 6/26/20. (ms)
June 25, 2020 Filing 3 STANDING PRACTICE ORDER 13-9 in Social Security Appeals (ao)
June 25, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Brandon Joseph Pehowic.(ao)
June 25, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul lodged pending the disposition of the Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed by Brandon Joseph Pehowic. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ao)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pehowic v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Represented By: Samuel S Dalke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brandon Joseph Pehowic
Represented By: Barbara L. Feudale
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?