Aucay v. Barr et al
| Juan Segundo Pando Aucay |
| Jennifer Ritchie, Craig A. Lowe, Kevin McAleenan, PA State Attorney General, William Barr and Lee Francis Cissna |
| 3:2020cv01512 |
| August 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| DB |
| Malachy E Mannion |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS by William Barr, Lee Francis Cissna, Craig A. Lowe, Jennifer Ritchie by William Barr, Lee Francis Cissna, Craig A. Lowe, Jennifer Ritchie. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s))(Sanderson, Joanne) |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION: Added a document to the Petition which was included in envelope but not added to docket. (lp) |
Filing 4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Show Cause Response due by 10/22/2020. (See order for details).Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 10/1/20. (bs)
|
| Filing 3 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED w/ Notice & Consent Form. (pjr) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Juan Segundo Pando Aucay.(pjr) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus lodged pending the disposition of the Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed by Juan Segundo Pando Aucay.(pjr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
