Erbe v. Commissioner of Social Security of the United States of America
Plaintiff: Richard Edward Erbe
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security of the United States of America
Case Number: 3:2020cv02132
Filed: November 16, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: Joseph F Saporito
Nature of Suit: Social Security: RSI Tax Suits
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 8, 2020 Filing 8 CONSENTS to Proceed Before US Magistrate Judge Saporito in Direct Assignment Cases pursuant to Standing Order 19-5. (jkc)
December 2, 2020 Filing 7 CONSENT FORM SENT (For Direct Assignment Cases to Magistrate Judges) to Commissioner of Social Security of the United States of America YOU MUST SAVE THIS FORM TO YOUR DESKTOP. THEN OPEN THE SAVED FORM AND COMPLETE THE REQUIRED SECTIONS. DO NOT FILE THIS FORM IN THE CLERKS OFFICE. THE FORM MUST BE E-MAILED TO consents@pamd.uscourts.gov OR IF YOU ARE NOT AN ECF REGISTERED USER, THEN MAIL THE FORM TO Clerks Administrative Assistant, Clerks Office, P.O. Box 1148, Scranton, PA 18501-1148. Consent Form due by 1/4/2021 (ms)
December 2, 2020 Filing 6 CONSENT FORM SENT (For Direct Assignment Cases to Magistrate Judges) to Richard Edward Erbe YOU MUST SAVE THIS FORM TO YOUR DESKTOP. THEN OPEN THE SAVED FORM AND COMPLETE THE REQUIRED SECTIONS. DO NOT FILE THIS FORM IN THE CLERKS OFFICE. THE FORM MUST BE E-MAILED TO consents@pamd.uscourts.gov OR IF YOU ARE NOT AN ECF REGISTERED USER, THEN MAIL THE FORM TO Clerks Administrative Assistant, Clerks Office, P.O. Box 1148, Scranton, PA 18501-1148. Consent Form due by 1/4/2021 (ms)
December 1, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by George Michael Thiel on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security of the United States of America. (Thiel, George)
November 24, 2020 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Richard Edward Erbe (Falvello, Alexis)
November 16, 2020 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security of the United States of America and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ep)
November 16, 2020 Filing 2 STANDING PRACTICE ORDER 13-9 in Social Security Appeals (ep)
November 16, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security of the United States of America ( Filing fee $400, Receipt Number APAMDC-5345291), filed by Richard Edward Erbe. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ep)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Erbe v. Commissioner of Social Security of the United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security of the United States of America
Represented By: George Michael Thiel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Edward Erbe
Represented By: Alexis C. Falvello
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?