Dietrick et al v. Barnett Outdoors, LLC
| Ronald Dietrick and Catherine Dietrick |
| Barnett Outdoors, LLC |
| 3:2020cv02157 |
| November 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Robert D Mariani |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 REPLY BRIEF re #3 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Barnett Outdoors, LLC.(Kaster, Bryon) |
| Filing 6 BRIEF IN OPPOSITION re #3 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Catherine Dietrick, Ronald Dietrick.(Yelen, Michael) |
| Filing 5 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #3 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Barnett Outdoors, LLC.(Kaster, Bryon) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Barnett Outdoors, LLC. (Kaster, Bryon) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss by Barnett Outdoors, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit(s) Exhibit A)(Kaster, Bryon) |
Filing 2
ORDER Re: Case Assignment and Procedures.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 11/19/20. (jam)
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Barnett Outdoors, LLC from Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2020-10003. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number APAMDC-5351186), filed by Barnett Outdoors, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Original Luzerne County Complaint, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(ep) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
