DOE v. McCarthy
JOHN DOE |
Debra McCarthy |
3:2021cv00294 |
February 17, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Robert D Mariani |
Assault Libel & Slander |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER granting in part and denying in part #6 Motion to Remand to State Court. Plaintiff's request that the action be remanded to state court is GRANTED. This action is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne County, PA. Plaintiff's request for attorney's fees is DENIED. Clerk of Court to CLOSE this case. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 4/5/21 (jam) |
Filing 12 MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry) re #6 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by JOHN DOE. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 4/5/21. (jam) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Barry H. Dyller on behalf of Debra McCarthy. (Dyller, Barry) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Tara Gabrielle Giarratano on behalf of All Defendants (Giarratano, Tara) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Stay re #5 Order Re: Case Assignment and Procedures, #4 MOTION for More Definite Statement by JOHN DOE. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Memo, #3 Proof of Service)(Jauregui, Tannia) |
Filing 8 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #4 MOTION for More Definite Statement filed by Debra McCarthy. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s))(Nealon, John) |
Filing 7 BRIEF IN OPPOSITION re #6 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Debra McCarthy. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit(s))(Nealon, John) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Remand to State Court by JOHN DOE. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Memo, #3 Notice of Motion, #4 Proof of Service, #5 Entry of Appearance)(Jauregui, Tannia) |
Filing 5 ORDER Re: Case Assignment and Procedures. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 2/18/21. (jam) |
Filing 4 MOTION for More Definite Statement by Debra McCarthy. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Nonconcurrence, #3 Exhibit(s) A, #4 Exhibit(s) Certificate of Service)(Nealon, John) |
Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Debra McCarthy. (Nealon, John) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by John R. Nealon on behalf of Debra McCarthy (Nealon, John) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by JOHN DOE from Luzerne County, case number 2021-00941. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 5475783), filed by JOHN DOE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) COMPLAINT, #2 Affidavit, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(sm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: DOE v. McCarthy | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Debra McCarthy | |
Represented By: | John R. Nealon |
Represented By: | Barry H. Dyller |
Represented By: | Tara Gabrielle Giarratano |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: JOHN DOE | |
Represented By: | Raul Jauregui |
Represented By: | Tannia A. Jauregui |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.