Saleem v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania et al
Mohammad Sohail Saleem |
John Doe (1), Hayles, Donna Varner, Department of Corrections, Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania, Mark Garman and Chernisky |
3:2021cv00542 |
March 24, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
CA |
Robert D Mariani |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 AO 398 and AO 399 Waiver of Service Forms Completed by Plaintiff. (dw) |
Filing 5 REISSUED PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number and the AO 85 Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent, #2 Instruction Sheet, #3 Fed and Local Rules, #4 398 Forms, #5 399 Form). Corrected plaintiff's address. (lp) |
Filing 4 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail #2 sent to Mohammad Sohail Saleem. (dw) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to Petition for Removal by Chernisky, Mark Garman, Hayles, Donna Varner.(Yarish, Mary Katherine) |
Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED w/ Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent, #2 Instruction Sheet, #3 Fed and Local Rules) (lp) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendants Varner, Garman, Hayles, Chernisky re: Mohammad Sohail Saleem from Centre County Courthouse, case number 20-3190. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAMDC-5522733), Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(lp) Modified on 3/25/2021 (lp). Modified on 3/25/2021 (lp). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.