Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. Valley Distributing & Storage Co.
| Norfolk Southern Railway Company |
| Valley Distributing & Storage Co. |
| 3:2021cv01034 |
| June 11, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Karoline Mehalchick |
| Commerce ICC Rates, Etc. |
| 49 U.S.C. ยง 11503 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Valley Distributing & Storage Co. answer due 8/21/2021. Signed by Chief MJ Karoline Mehalchick on 8/9/2021 (cw)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Valley Distributing & Storage Co..(Walsh, Kevin) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Valley Distributing & Storage Co. answer due 8/6/2021. Signed by Chief MJ Karoline Mehalchick on 7/9/2021 (cw)
|
| Filing 10 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO FRCP 7.1 by Valley Distributing & Storage Co.. (Walsh, Kevin) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT FORM SENT (For Direct Assignment Cases to Magistrate Judges) to Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Valley Distributing & Storage Co. YOU MUST SAVE THIS FORM TO YOUR DESKTOP. THEN OPEN THE SAVED FORM AND COMPLETE THE REQUIRED SECTIONS. DO NOT FILE THIS FORM IN THE CLERKS OFFICE. THE FORM MUST BE E-MAILED TO consents@pamd.uscourts.gov OR IF YOU ARE NOT AN ECF REGISTERED USER, THEN MAIL THE FORM TO Clerks Administrative Assistant, Clerks Office, P.O. Box 1148, Scranton, PA 18501-1148. Consent Form due by 8/9/2021 (Attachments: #1 Defendant's Direct Consent Form) (cw) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Valley Distributing & Storage Co.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Walsh, Kevin) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Kevin Martin Walsh, Jr on behalf of Valley Distributing & Storage Co.. (Walsh, Kevin) |
| Filing 6 SPECIAL ADMISSIONS FORM APPROVED as to Matthew J. Haskins, Esq. Signed by Chief MJ Karoline Mehalchick on 7/1/21. (dw) |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION: Matthew J. Haskins, Esquire - active status confirmed. (dw) |
| Filing 5 PETITION FOR SPECIAL ADMISSION (PRO HAC VICE) by Matthew Haskins on behalf of Norfolk Southern Railway Company Attorney Matthew J. Haskins is seeking special admission. Filing fee $ 50, receipt number APAMDC-5622162.. (Haskins, Matthew) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Norfolk Southern Railway Company. Valley Distributing & Storage Co. served on 6/16/2021, answer due 7/7/2021. (Cohen, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Valley Distributing & Storage Co. and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet MJ) (dw) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO FRCP 7.1 by Norfolk Southern Railway Company identifying Corporate Parent Norfolk Southern Corporation for Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (dw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Valley Distributing & Storage Co. ( Filing fee $402, Receipt Number APAMDC-5604455) filed by Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(dw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
