Charles v. Lowe et al
Petitioner: Jonathan Pena Charles
Respondent: Warden Craig A. Lowe and Immigration Customs & Enforcement
Case Number: 3:2021cv01595
Filed: September 15, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: CA
Referring Judge: Robert D Mariani
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainees
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Motion for Enlargement of time to file a reply to Respondent's answer to the habeas petition. Reply due 12/6/21. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 11/5/21 (jam)
November 4, 2021 Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Traverse by Jonathan Pena Charles.(ep)
October 14, 2021 Filing 7 RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS by Immigration Customs & Enforcement, Warden Craig A. Lowe by Immigration Customs & Enforcement, Warden Craig A. Lowe. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s))(Sanderson, Joanne)
September 24, 2021 Filing 6 SHOW CAUSE ORDER and Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Served on Warden Lowe, ICE, U.S. Atty General Wash DC and US Atty Scr (ep)
September 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; PETITION IS DEEMED FILED; Show Cause Response due by 10/15/2021. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 9/23/21. (ep)
September 24, 2021 Receipt of payment from JONATHAN PENA CHARLES in the amount of $5.00 for WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. Transaction posted on 9/23/2021. Receipt number 333078120 processed by gangeli. (jjs)
September 23, 2021 Filing 4 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 333078120. Petition is now deemed FILED. (ep)
September 15, 2021 Filing 3 THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER directing the prisoner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed by lp on 09/15/2021. (Attachments: #1 IFP (habeas corpus))(lp)
September 15, 2021 Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number and the AO 85 Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent) (lp)
September 15, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by Jonathan Pena Charles. (Attachments: #1 Petitioner's Cover Letter)(lp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Charles v. Lowe et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jonathan Pena Charles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Craig A. Lowe
Represented By: Joseph J Terz
Represented By: Joanne M. Sanderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Immigration Customs & Enforcement
Represented By: Joseph J Terz
Represented By: Joanne M. Sanderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?