Bradshaw v. Oberlander et al
Petitioner: Tyler Bradshaw
Respondent: Derek Oberlander and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Case Number: 3:2021cv01618
Filed: September 20, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: CA
Referring Judge: Robert D Mariani
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; dismissing #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed ifp as moot on Petnr's payment of the requisite filing fee. The habeas is DEEMED filed. The Clerk of Court is directed to serve a copy of the petition (Doc. 1) and this Order on the Respdts and the DA of Cumberland County. Within 21 days, Respdts shall answer the allegations. See Order for further details. Show Cause Response due by 11/19/2021. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 10/28/21. (ao)
October 28, 2021 SHOW CAUSE ORDER and Doc. #1 Served on Supt Derek Oberlander, PA Atty General, DA of Cumberland County (ao)
October 25, 2021 Filing 6 ELECTION FORM filed by Tyler Bradshaw. (ao)
September 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Tyler Bradshaw : ORDERED THAT: Petitioner is granted leave to withdraw the current 2254 petition without prejudice to file another 2254 petition raising all grounds for relief from his conviction. Petitioner is granted 30 days from the date of this Order to notify the Court of his decision. If he fails to do so, the Court will rule on the current 2254 petition as filed. See Order for full details. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 9/20/21. (jam)
September 21, 2021 Receipt of payment from TYLER BRADSHAW in the amount of $5.00 for WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. Transaction posted on 9/20/2021. Receipt number 333078067 processed by aoswald. (jjs)
September 20, 2021 Filing 4 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 333078067. Petition is now deemed FILED. (ao)
September 20, 2021 Filing 3 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number and the AO 85 Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent) (lp)
September 20, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tyler Bradshaw.(lp)
September 20, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $5, Receipt Number 333), filed by Tyler Bradshaw.(lp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bradshaw v. Oberlander et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Tyler Bradshaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Derek Oberlander
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?