Hill v. Bradley
Sheldon W. Hill |
E. Bradley |
3:2021cv01857 |
November 1, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
DB |
Malachy E Mannion |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS by E. Bradley by E. Bradley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Unpublished Opinion(s))(Black, Bryan) |
Filing 9 SHOW CAUSE ORDER and Petition and Order Served on Warden, AUSA and Atty Gen of USA (sm) |
![]() |
Filing 7 CERTIFIED Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement for Sheldon W. Hill. (ao) |
Filing 6 FIFTEEN (15) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER - Within 15 days of the date of this Order, the Warden or other appropriate official of the institution at which Plaintiff is currently incarcerated is directed to provide to the Court, under oath, or declare under penalty of perjury, a statement of the current balance in the Plaintiffs account and a record of the transactions in his account that have occurred with the preceding six (6) months. Order sent to Superintendent and petitioner. Signed by LP on 11/15/2021. (lp) |
Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Sheldon W. Hill. (sm) |
Filing 4 MOTION (Application)for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Sheldon W. Hill.(sm) |
Filing 3 THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER directing the prisoner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed by LP on 11/02/2021. (Attachments: #1 IFP (habeas corpus))(lp) |
Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number and the AO 85 Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent) (lp) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by Sheldon W. Hill. (Attachments: #1 Petitioner's General Cover Letter, #2 Exhibit 1-Inmate Education Data Transcript dated August 6, 2021, #3 Exhibit 2-Blackstone Career Institute Student Transcript 31 Lesson Legal Assistant/Paralegal Certificate Program, #4 Exhibit 3-Request for Administrative Remedy submitted by petitioner and response thereto., #5 Exhibit 4-Attempt at Informal Resolution signed by P. Kurilla, Unit Manager dated August 30, 2021, #6 Exhibit 5-Request for Administrative Remedy dated August 31, 2021 and response by Warden Bradley, #7 Exhibit 6-Regional Administrative Remedy Request dated September 14, 2021 and response thereto, #8 Exhibit 7-"Program Statement" of Education Training and Leisure Time Programs Standards)(lp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hill v. Bradley | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Sheldon W. Hill | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: E. Bradley | |
Represented By: | Joseph J Terz |
Represented By: | Bryan Craig Black |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.