Jones v. Boone et al
| Shawn Jones |
| Sgt. Boone and C.O. 1 Smitty |
| 3:2021cv01977 |
| November 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Karoline Mehalchick |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Certified Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Shawn Jones. (sm) |
| Filing 5 Waiver of Service forms (AO 398 and 399) Mailed to All Defendants w/ copy of Order and Complaint ; Waiver of Service due by 1/18/2022.; cc waiver order and complaint to PA Atty General(sm) |
Filing 4
ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK'S OFFICE TO SEND AO 398 AND 399 WAIVERS FORMS to defendants. ; Order Granting Application to Proceed IFP; Complaint is DEEMED FILED; cc to Warden to begin PLRA payments. Signed by Chief MJ Karoline Mehalchick on 12/16/21. (sm)
|
| Filing 3 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number. (Attachments: #1 Instruction Sheet, #2 Fed & Local Rules, #3 398 Form, #4 399 Forms) (lp) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFIED MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Shawn Jones.(lp) Modified on 11/19/2021 (lp). Attached is the Prisoner Trust Fund Statement. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sgt. Boone, C.O. 1 Smitty lodged pending the disposition of the Motion for In Forma Pauperis, filed by Shawn Jones.(lp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
