Liptok v. CACL federal credit union et al
John J. Liptok |
CACL federal credit union, Robert A Mercuri, Edward J. Clark, Robert J. James, Joseph J. Devine, James R. Krammer, Michael J. Rozella, Kevin D. McNamara, Christian S. Newton, John W. Toomey, Brian P. Dries and Ronald Gudinas 2 |
3:2021cv02144 |
December 21, 2021 |
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Martin C Carlson |
Jennifer P Wilson |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that the pltfs mtn for leave to proceed ifp, #2 , is CONDITIONALLY GRANTED but IT IS RECOMMENDED that the pltfs complaint be dismissed with prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 1/12/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on 12/29/21. (ma) |
![]() |
Filing 3 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number. (aaa) |
VERBAL ORDER REASSIGNING CASE - Case reassigned to Honorable Jennifer P. Wilson and referred to Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson for the filing of a Report and Recommendation. (jkc) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by John J. Liptok.(aaa) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants lodged pending the disposition of the Motion for In Forma Pauperis, filed by John J. Liptok.(aaa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.