Belles v. Commissioner of Social Security
| James Stephen Belles |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 3:2021cv02179 |
| December 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Karoline Mehalchick |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CONSENT FORM SENT (For Direct Assignment Cases to Magistrate Judges) to James Stephen Belles, Commissioner of Social Security YOU MUST SAVE THIS FORM TO YOUR DESKTOP. THEN OPEN THE SAVED FORM AND COMPLETE THE REQUIRED SECTIONS. DO NOT FILE THIS FORM IN THE CLERKS OFFICE. THE FORM MUST BE E-MAILED TO consents@pamd.uscourts.gov OR IF YOU ARE NOT AN ECF REGISTERED USER, THEN MAIL THE FORM TO Clerks Administrative Assistant, Clerks Office, P.O. Box 1148, Scranton, PA 18501-1148. Consent Form due by 3/21/2022 (Attachments: #1 Defendant's Direct Consent Form) (cw) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by George Michael Thiel on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security. (Thiel, George) |
| Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE Executed; USM served Summons and Complaint on U.S. Atty General Wash DC 2/14/22. (ep) |
| Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE Executed ; USM served Summons and Complaint on Commissioner Social Security 2/14/22. (ep) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed Commissioner of Social Security; USM served Summons and Complaint on U.S. Atty Scranton on 2/14/2022, answer due 4/15/2022. (ep) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security and provided TO U.S. MARSHAL for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Attachments: #1 USM 285 Service Form) (ep) |
Filing 5
ORDER DIRECTING U.S. MARSHAL TO SERVE SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT ; granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED; Signed by Chief MJ Karoline Mehalchick on 2/7/22. (ep)
|
| Filing 4 STATUS REPORT by James Stephen Belles. (Hall, Jamie) |
| Filing 3 STANDING PRACTICE ORDER 13-9 in Social Security Appeals (ga) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by James Stephen Belles.(ga) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security lodged pending the disposition of the Motion for In Forma Pauperis, filed by James Stephen Belles. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ga) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Belles v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: James Stephen Belles | |
| Represented By: | Jamie Ryan Hall |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | George Michael Thiel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
