Charles v. Garland et al
Plaintiff: Jonathan Pena Charles
Defendant: Merrick Garland, David L. Neal, David H. Wetmore and Alejandro Mayorkas
Case Number: 3:2022cv00350
Filed: March 9, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: CA
Referring Judge: Robert D Mariani
Nature of Suit: Mandamus & Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 27, 2022 Filing 6 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail doc #5 sent to Jonathan Pena Charles "return to sender, no longer here" (sm)
April 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER DISMISSING CASE: This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. Clerk of COurt is directed to CLOSE this case. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 4/13/22. (jam)
March 9, 2022 Filing 4 THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER directing the prisoner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed by LP on 03/09/2022. (Attachments: #1 ifp (COMPLAINT IN MANDAMUS))(lp)
March 9, 2022 Filing 3 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number and the AO 85 Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent, #2 Instruction Sheet, #3 Fed and Local Rules, #4 398 Forms, #5 399 Form) (lp)
March 9, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunction by Jonathan Pena Charles. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Sinott Docket Sheet, #2 Exhibit B-Sinott Superior Court)(lp)
March 9, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT IN MANDAMUS against Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, David L. Neal, David H. Wetmore, filed by Jonathan Pena Charles. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-February 4, 2022 Third Circuit Decision, #2 Exhibit B-Plaintiff's Motion to Reopen, #3 Exhibit B-Docket Sheet in Commonwealth v. Sinott from the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia, #4 Exhibit C-Superior Court's Affirmation Sinott, #5 Exhibit D-Pennsylvania Supreme Court's Affirmance of Sinott)(lp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Charles v. Garland et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jonathan Pena Charles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Merrick Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David L. Neal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David H. Wetmore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?