Booher v. Wakefield et al
| Joshua Booher |
| Chad Wakefield and Corrections Officers John Doe |
| 3:2022cv00672 |
| May 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Joseph F Saporito |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned by Chad Wakefield. Chad Wakefield waiver sent on 5/9/2022, answer due 7/8/2022. (DeFelice, Chase) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet mj) (dw) |
Filing 2
ORDER - Clerk of Court shall issue summons and provide same to counsel for plaintiff for service of complaint upon named defendants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph F. Saporito, Jr on 5/10/22. (ms)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Corrections Officers John Doe, Chad Wakefield ( Filing fee $402, Receipt Number APAMDC-5938307), filed by Joshua Booher. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(lp) Modified on 5/6/2022 (lp). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
