Martinez v. United States et al
| Manuel Aguilar Martinez |
| United States, J. Meyers, National Gang Unit Agency, S.I.S. and Federal Bureau of Prisons |
| 3:2022cv00794 |
| May 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Karoline Mehalchick |
| Sylvia H Rambo |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER TERMINATING CASE Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 7/11/22. (ma)
|
| VERBAL ORDER REASSIGNING CASE - Case reassigned to Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo for all further proceedings. (jkc) |
| Filing 3 (THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER) directing the prisoner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application)(ktt) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number. (Attachments: #1 Pro Se Prisoner Instructions for Filing a Complaint, #2 Excerpts of Local and Federal Rules, #3 AO 398, #4 AO 399) (ktt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by the plaintiff against Federal Bureau of Prisons, J. Meyers, National Gang Unit Agency, S.I.S., United States lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed.(jw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
