Sparks II v. Ridgefield Police Department et al
| Tod M. Sparks II |
| Ridgefield Police Department, Officer Jeffrey Ladue 195, Ralph T. Webdale, Union Savings Bank Ridgefield Ct. and Winter Garden Ice Arena |
| 3:2022cv01072 |
| July 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Karoline Mehalchick |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| DOCKET ANNOTATION: Case transferred from Pennsylvania Middle has been opened in District of Connecticut as case 3:22-cv-00876, filed 07/11/2022. (jw) |
Filing 4
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE - Based on the foregoing, it is ORDERED that this case be transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut for further proceedings, including disposition of all pending motions. Signed by Chief MJ Karoline Mehalchick on 7/11/2022. (cw)
|
| DOCKET ANNOTATION: Case electronically transferred on this date to the District of Connecticut. (cw) |
| Filing 3 STANDING PRACTICE ORDER. (dw) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number. (dw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed by Tod M. Sparks II. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s))(dw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
