Patrick v. Kingston Police Department et al
| Quincy Michael Patrick |
| Kingston Police Department, State Parole Scranton, Det. Richard Kotchin, Scott L. Ravert and John B. |
| 3:2022cv01167 |
| July 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Martin C Carlson |
| Malachy E Mannion |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER - 1. Plaintiffs Application for Leave to proceed in Forma Pauperis isGRANTED. 2. For screening purposes only the Complaint is DEEMED filed. Service isdeferred pending completion of legally-mandated screening. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on July 28, 2022. (kjn)
|
| Filing 4 STANDING PRACTICE ORDER. (ibr) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number. (ibr) |
| VERBAL ORDER REASSIGNING CASE - Case reassigned to Honorable Malachy E Mannion and referred to Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson for the filing of a Report and Recommendation. (jkc) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Quincy Michael Patrick. (ibr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants pending the disposition of the Motion for In Forma Pauperis, filed by Quincy Michael Patrick. (ibr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
