Autar v. SSA
Leah Autar |
SSA |
3:2022cv01347 |
August 29, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Karoline Mehalchick |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to #6 Summons Issued as to USA, rec'd by SSA on 9/12/22. (ao) |
Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to #6 Summons Issued as to USA, rec'd by Attorney General on 9/12/22. (ao) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed SSA served on 9/1/2022, answer due 10/31/2022. (ao) |
Filing 8 CONSENT FORM SENT (For Direct Assignment Cases to Magistrate Judges) to Leah Autar, SSA YOU MUST SAVE THIS FORM TO YOUR DESKTOP. THEN OPEN THE SAVED FORM AND COMPLETE THE REQUIRED SECTIONS. DO NOT FILE THIS FORM IN THE CLERKS OFFICE. THE COMPLETED FORM MUST BE E-MAILED TO consents@pamd.uscourts.gov OR IF YOU DO NOT HAVE AN E-MAIL ACCOUNT YOU MAY MAIL THE FORM TO Clerks Administrative Assistant, Clerks Office, P.O. Box 1148, Scranton, PA 18501-1148. Consent Form due by 10/6/2022 (Attachments: #1 Defendant's Direct Consent form) (cw) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Timothy S. Judge on behalf of SSA. (Judge, Timothy) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to SSA and provided TO U.S. MARSHAL for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve them with the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). After you make service, you are further directed to file a Return of Service using the event Summons Returned Executed as to USA under the category Service of Process, in ECF. (Attachments: #1 AO 285 US Atty, #2 AO 285 Atty Gen, #3 AO 285 SSA) (sm) |
Filing 5 ORDER GRANTING application to proceed IFP #2 ; Clerk of Court is directed to Issue process to U.S. MARSHAL TO SERVE SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT ; All parties shall comply with the Standing Practice Order ; Complaint is deemed FILED. Signed by Chief MJ Karoline Mehalchick on 8/30/22. (sm) |
Filing 4 STANDING PRACTICE ORDER 13-9 in Social Security Appeals (ao) |
Filing 3 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number. (ao) |
Filing 2 MOTION (Application) for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Leah Autar.(ao) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SSA lodged pending the disposition of the Motion for In Forma Pauperis, filed by Leah Autar. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ao) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Autar v. SSA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Leah Autar | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: SSA | |
Represented By: | Timothy S. Judge |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.