Catanzaro v. Innovation First, Inc. et al
| David J. Catanzaro |
| Innovation First, Inc. and Does 1 Through 50 |
| 3:2022cv01755 |
| November 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Malachy E Mannion |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 STANDING PRACTICE ORDER (ep) |
| Filing 4 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number and the AO 85 Notice & Consent Form. (ep) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/7/2022: #1 AO85) (ep). |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Does 1 Through 50, Innovation First, Inc. and provided TO PRO SE PLTF VIA U.S. MAIL for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (ep) |
| Filing 2 REPORT to Commissioner of filing or determination of an actionPATENT. (ep) |
| Receipt of payment from DAVID J CATANZARO in the amount of $402.00 for Civil Filing Fee- Non-Prisoner. Transaction posted on 11/3/2022. Receipt number 333101763 processed by EP. (jjs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Does 1 Through 50, Innovation First, Inc. ( Filing fee $402, Receipt Number 333101763), filed by David J. Catanzaro. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Filing Fee Receipt)(ep) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
