Sheridan v. Progressive Specialty Insurance Company et al
Plaintiff: Joseph Sheridan
Defendant: Progressive Specialty Insurance Company, Progressive Auto, Progressive Insurance, Progressive and Ryan Thomas
Case Number: 3:2022cv01915
Filed: December 2, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: Susan E Schwab
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 5, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Joseph Sheridan (Lenahan, Timothy)
December 2, 2022 Filing 2 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO FRCP 7.1 by Progressive Specialty Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Drive Insurance Holdings, Inc. for Progressive Specialty Insurance Company. (aaa)
December 2, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Progressive Specialty Insurance Company, Ryan Thomas from Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas, case number 22-4481. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAMDC-6133488), filed by Progressive Specialty Insurance Company, Ryan Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Cert of Service, #3 Exhibit(s) A, #4 B)(aaa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sheridan v. Progressive Specialty Insurance Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Progressive Specialty Insurance Company
Represented By: Daniel J. Twilla
Represented By: Kathleen P Dapper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Progressive Auto
Represented By: Daniel J. Twilla
Represented By: Kathleen P Dapper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Progressive Insurance
Represented By: Daniel J. Twilla
Represented By: Kathleen P Dapper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Progressive
Represented By: Daniel J. Twilla
Represented By: Kathleen P Dapper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ryan Thomas
Represented By: Daniel J. Twilla
Represented By: Kathleen P Dapper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Sheridan
Represented By: John R. Lenahan, III
Represented By: Timothy G. Lenahan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?