SPENCE v. MCGINLEY
| Levar Lee Spence |
| Thomas McGinley |
| 3:2023cv00213 |
| February 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| CA |
| Robert D Mariani |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER denying #9 Motion for Reconsideration. The application for leave to proceed ifp is DENIED because it lacks the required authorization and the required certified prisoner account statement (Doc. 10). Signed by Honorable Robert D Mariani on 4/6/23 (ao)
|
| Filing 10 UNCERTIFIED MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Levar Lee Spence.(ao) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Reconsideration re #7 Order Dismissing Case, by Levar Lee Spence.(ao) |
| Filing 8 Mail Returned (Doc. #7) as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Levar Lee Spence (ao) |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION: Doc #7 re-mailed to Pltf Spence at SCI-Coal Township. (ao) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER DISMISSING CASE - More than 30 days have elapsed and the petnr has not submitted the requisite filing fee or an application to proceed ifp, nor has he requested an extension of time in which to do so. Therefore, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of Court directed to CLOSE this case. Signed by Honorable Robert D Mariani on 3/10/23. (ao)
|
| Filing 6 THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER directing the prisoner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed by LP on 02/07/2023. (Attachments: #1 IFP (habeas corpus))(lp) |
| Filing 5 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number and the AO 85 Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent) (lp) |
| Filing 4 Case transferred electronically in from District of Pennsylvania Eastern; Case Number 2:23-cv-00301 containing electronic documents. |
|
Filing 3
ORDER THAT CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO TRANSFER THIS CASE TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AND CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 1/31/23. 1/31/23 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO SPENCE. (rf, ) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Eastern on 2/7/2023.]
|
| Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (rf, ) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Eastern on 2/7/2023.] |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by LEVAR LEE SPENCE., EXHIBITS, ENVELOPE ATTACHED *NO FEE PAID. NO IFP*(rf, ) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Eastern on 2/7/2023.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: SPENCE v. MCGINLEY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Levar Lee Spence | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Thomas McGinley | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
