Barot et al v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services et al
| Hetal Sachinkumar Barot and Ravikumar Navinbhai Patel |
| U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services and Ur Mendoza Jaddou |
| 3:2023cv01147 |
| July 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Jennifer P Wilson |
| Other Immigration Action |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Gerard Thomas Donahue on behalf of Ur Mendoza Jaddou, U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services. (Donahue, Gerard) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou, U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (sh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT IN MANDAMUS against Ur Mendoza Jaddou, U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services ( Filing fee $402, Receipt Number APAMDC-6337719), filed by Hetal Sachinkumar Barot, Ravikumar Navinbhai Patel. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibits A and B)(sh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
