Nouri v. University of Scranton
| Michael Nouri |
| University of Scranton |
| 3:2023cv01362 |
| August 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Malachy E Mannion |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
SCHEDULING ORDER: TELEPHONIC Case Management Conference set for 11/1/2023 01:00 PM before Honorable Malachy E Mannion. Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 10/13/2023. (gg)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by University of Scranton. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Baughman, Michael) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michael Nouri. University of Scranton served on 8/21/2023, answer due 10/11/2023. (Lynch, Gary) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER GRANTING #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint. University of Scranton answer due 10/11/2023. Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 08/25/2023 (gg)
|
| Filing 7 LETTER Re: Case Assignment and Procedures Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 08/25/2023. (gg) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by University of Scranton. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Baughman, Michael) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by University of Scranton. (Baughman, Michael) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael E. Baughman on behalf of University of Scranton. (Baughman, Michael) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Adam Ryan Martin on behalf of University of Scranton. (Martin, Adam) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to University of Scranton and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (ao) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against University of Scranton ( Filing fee $402, Receipt Number APAMDC-6373084), filed by Michael Nouri. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ao) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Nouri v. University of Scranton | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael Nouri | |
| Represented By: | Gary F. Lynch |
| Represented By: | Jamisen A. Etzel |
| Represented By: | Nicholas A. Colella |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: University of Scranton | |
| Represented By: | Adam Ryan Martin |
| Represented By: | Michael E. Baughman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
