Douglas v. Yugulis
Andrew Douglas |
Edward Raymond Gollihu Yugulis and Edward Raymond Gollihue Yugulis |
3:2023cv01510 |
September 12, 2023 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Daryl F Bloom |
Joseph F Saporito |
Assault Libel & Slander |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
VERBAL ORDER REASSIGNING CASE - Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Daryl F. Bloom for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Joseph F. Saporito, Jr no longer assigned to case. (jw) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Edward Raymond Gollihu Yugulis and provided TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF VIA U.S. MAIL for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (dw) |
Filing 4 ORDER directing Clerk to issue summons and provide to plaintiff Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph F. Saporito, Jr on 9/13/23. (ms) |
Receipt of payment from ANDREW DOUGLAS in the amount of $402.00 for Civil Filing Fee- Non-Prisoner. Transaction posted on 9/12/2023. Receipt number 333106322 processed by GR. (jjs) |
Filing 3 PRO SE STANDING PRACTICE ORDER (ep) |
Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number. (ep) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Edward Raymond Gollihu Yugulis ( Filing fee $402, Receipt Number 333106322), filed by Andrew Douglas. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Filing Fee Receipt)(ep) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.