Smith, Sr. v. McGinley et al
| Mark Edward Smith, Sr. |
| Thomas McGinley, District Attorney of Monroe County and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office |
| 3:2023cv01952 |
| November 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| CA |
| Robert D Mariani |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER DISMISSING without prejudice #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c). Signed by Honorable Robert D Mariani on 11/27/2023. (cac)
|
| Filing 3 THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER directing the prisoner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed by LP on 11/27/2023. (Attachments: #1 IFP (habeas corpus))(lp) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number and the AO 85 Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent) (lp) |
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by Mark Edward Smith, Sr.. (Attachments: #1 Court Order signed by Judge Mariani in Civil Action No. 3:23-CV-1456)(lp)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
