Smith, Sr. v. McGinley et al
Mark Edward Smith, Sr. |
Thomas McGinley and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office |
3:2024cv00420 |
March 12, 2024 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
CA |
Robert D Mariani |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Copy of Order of dismissal from petitioner and copy of (what appears to be duplicate) of 2254 Petition rec'd via certified mail. by Mark Edward Smith, Sr... (Attachments: #1 2254 Petition)(lp) |
Filing 4 ORDER re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability. See U.S.C. 2253(c) Signed by Honorable Robert D Mariani on 3/13/2024. (cac) |
Filing 3 THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER directing the prisoner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed by LP on 03/12/2024. (Attachments: #1 IFP (habeas corpus))(lp) |
Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number and the AO 85 Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent) (lp) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by Mark Edward Smith, Sr..(lp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.