Ray et al v. McZeal et al
Cierra Ray and Luxe II Realty Holdings, LLC |
Alfred McZeal and Houston Real Estate Business |
3:2024cv00619 |
April 10, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Daryl F Bloom |
Real Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Receipt of payment from DPAM324CV000619 in the amount of $405.00 for Civil Filing Fee- Non-Prisoner. Transaction posted on 4/10/2024. Receipt number 333109386 processed by AO. (jjs) |
Filing 2 CONSENT FORM SENT (For Direct Assignment Cases to Magistrate Judges) to Houston Real Estate Business, Luxe II Realty Holdings, LLC, Alfred McZeal, Cierra Ray YOU MUST SAVE THIS FORM TO YOUR DESKTOP. THEN OPEN THE SAVED FORM AND COMPLETE THE REQUIRED SECTIONS. DO NOT FILE THIS FORM IN THE CLERKS OFFICE. THE COMPLETED FORM MUST BE E-MAILED TO consents@pamd.uscourts.gov OR IF YOU DO NOT HAVE AN E-MAIL ACCOUNT YOU MAY MAIL THE FORM TO Clerks Administrative Assistant, Clerks Office, P.O. Box 1148, Scranton, PA 18501-1148. Consent Form due by 5/10/2024 (kjn) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Alfred McZeal from Monroe County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2024-cv-1196. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number 333109386), filed by Cierra Ray, Luxe II Realty Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Receipt, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(aaa) Modified on 4/11/2024 (aaa). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.