Doe v. Ability Recovery Services, LLC et al
| Jane Doe |
| Ability Recovery Services, LLC and Ability Recovery, LLC |
| 3:2024cv00713 |
| April 25, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Malachy E Mannion |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #3 MOTION for Order to Proceed Anonymously filed by Jane Doe.(Robinette, Justin) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Order to Proceed Anonymously by Jane Doe. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Robinette, Justin) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Ability Recovery Services, LLC, Ability Recovery, LLC and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (ao) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ability Recovery Services, LLC, Ability Recovery, LLC ( Filing fee $405, Receipt Number APAMDC-6619873), filed by Jane Doe. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit(s))(ao) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
