Abdul-Salaam v. Beard, et al
Petitioner: Abdul-Salaam
Respondent: Jeffrey Beard, William S. Stickman, III., Joseph P. Mazurkiewicz, . . Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, The and cumberland county district attorney's office
Case Number: 4:2002cv02124
Filed: November 25, 2002
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Williamsport Office
County: Greene
Presiding Judge: AM
Presiding Judge: John E. Jones
Nature of Suit: Death Penalty
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 218 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). NOW, THEREFORE, upon consideration of Petitioner Seifullah Abdul-Salaams motion to alter and amend judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) (Doc. 215), and in accordance with the Memorandum issued this date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the motion (Doc. 215) is DENIED. (eo)
April 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 214 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). 1. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 8) is DENIED. 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. 3. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). (eo)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Abdul-Salaam v. Beard, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Abdul-Salaam
Represented By: Michael Wiseman
Represented By: David L. Zuckerman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jeffrey Beard
Represented By: Jaime M. Keating
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: William S. Stickman, III.
Represented By: Jaime M. Keating
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Joseph P. Mazurkiewicz
Represented By: Jaime M. Keating
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: . . Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, The
Represented By: Jaime M. Keating
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: cumberland county district attorney's office
Represented By: Jaime M. Keating
Represented By: Jaime M. Keating
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?