Sikkelee v. Precision Airmotive Corporation et al
| Jill Sikkelee |
| Precision Airmotive Corporation, Precision Airmotive LLC, Precision Aerospace Corporation, Precision Aerospace Services LLC, Precision Aviation Products Corporation, Precision Products LLC, Zenith Fuel Systems LLC, Burns International Services Corporation, Former Fuel Systems, Inc., Mark IV Industries, Inc., Textron Lycoming Reciprocating Engine Division, Textron, Inc., Avco Corporation, Kelly Aerospace, Inc., Kelly Aerospace Power Systems, Inc., Electrosystems, Inc. and Consolidated Fuel Systems, Inc. |
| 4:2007cv00886 |
| May 16, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Williamsport Office |
| Lycoming |
| John E. Jones |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
720
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT ISHEREBY ORDERED that Sikkelee's 651 motion in limine to preclude evidence of statistics and studies is GRANTED; Sikkelee's 653 motion in limine to preclude evidence of p ropeller damage comparisons is DENIED; Sikkelee's 655 motion in limine to preclude FAA inspector statements is GRANTED; Sikkelee's 657 motion in limine to preclude complaints about maintenance is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; Sikkelee' s 659 motion in limine to preclude evidence of resolved claims is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; Lycoming's 662 motion in limine to preclude evidence of Service Difficulty Reports, Service Information Records, warranty claims, and other lawsuits is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; Lycoming's 664 motion to strike the opinion of Michael Thomson is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; Lycoming's 666 motion in limine to preclude evidence of certain alleged carburetor de fects is GRANTED; Lycoming's 668 motion in limine to preclude evidence of subsequent remedial measures and other post-accident evidence is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; andLycoming's 670 motion in limine to exclude the affidavit and depositiontestimony of Emagene Maar is GRANTED. (See Order for further details.) Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 3/1/2021. (jr)
|
|
Filing
708
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Sikkelee's 606 motion to strike the replacement expert opinions is DENIED; Sikkelee's 608 motion to strike the opinion of Tom Eagar is DENIED; Sikk elee's 610 motion to strike the opinions of Dale Alexander and Gary Novak is DENIED; Sikkelee's 612 motion to strike propeller analysis and RPM calculation is DENIED; Sikkelee's 614 motion to strike the opinion of Jeffrey Edwards is GRANTED in part; Lycoming's 616 motion to strike the opinion of Michael Schiefer is GRANTED in part; Lycoming's 618 motion to strike the opinion of Donald Sommer is DENIED; Lycoming's 627 motion to strike the rebuttal opinions of Donald Sommer and Richard McSwain is DENIED; and Sikkelee's 648 motion to strike the opinion of Michael Dreikorn is DENIED. (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS.) Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 2/4/2021. (jr)
|
|
Filing
567
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 497 Lycoming's Motion for Reconsideration as to Plaintiffs § 21.3 claim is GRANTED. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 8/3/2017. (jn)
|
|
Filing
495
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry) re 482 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Avco Corporation, Textron Lycoming Reciprocating Engine Division.Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 9/10/14. (km)
|
|
Filing
457
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry, ECF No. 456): Directing the parties to brief the issue of the appropriate standard of care to be applied and setting deadlines for same; continuing the case from the December 2013 trial li st to the March 2014 trial list, commencing w/jury selection 3/10/2014 at 09:30 AM in Williamsport - Courtroom 1 before Honorable Matthew W. Brann; presentation of the case to the jury shall commence immediately following jury selection; trial in this case is fixed for a two-week trial term. (See Order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 11/20/13. (km)
|
|
Filing
363
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: DENYING Lycoming's motion for reconsideration 360 . Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 7/9/13. (km)
|
|
Filing
359
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: DENYING AVCO's Renewed Motion 332 for Reconsideration of Order Entered 7/3/2012. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 6/3/13. (km)
|
|
Filing
342
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: 1) Plaintiff's Motion for Discovery Sanctions against Defendant Lycoming (Doc. 310) is DENIED AS MOOT except with respect to the redacted e-mails which Defendant provided to Plaintiff. 2) Plaintiff's Motion for Disc overy Sanctions against Defendant Lycoming is GRANTED, IN PART, insofar that Defendant Lycoming is directed to provide Plaintiff with unredacted e-mails marked as Bates numbers LYCS 5107-5108 and Bates number LYCS 5118, to the extent stated in our foregoing Memorandum, within 10 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Blewitt on 11/30/12. (ms)
|
|
Filing
204
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED 1.The Kelly Defendants Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 175) is DENIED 2. The Precision Defendants Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 167) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART to the extent indicated; a. All previously dismis sed allegations and Defendants are STRICKEN from the Amended Complaint. 3.The Avco Defendants Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART to the extent indicated; 4.Counts V, X, and XI with respect to the Avco (Textron in the Amended Comp laint) Defendants are DISMISSED; 5. Plaintiff SHALL FILE a Second Amended Complaint pursuant to the dictates of this Memorandum within ten (10) days of the date of this Order. Failure to properly amend within the allotted time may result in prejudicial dismissal of the action. Signed by Honorable John E. Jones, III on 4/8/11. (pw, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
