Stinson v. Wakefield et al
| Charles Howard Stinson |
| David J. Wakefield and PA State Attorney General |
| 4:2007cv01237 |
| July 9, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Williamsport Office |
| Adams |
| SF |
| James F. McClure |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
82
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Stinsons motion for relief from judgment 71 & 72 is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 3/6/17. (rw)
|
|
Filing
65
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Charles Howard Stinson is DENIED. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. Signed by Chief Judge Yvette Kane on Feb. 1, 2012. (sc)
|
|
Filing
60
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: DENYING petitioner's 29 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment.Signed by Honorable James F. McClure, Jr on 4/9/10. (km, )
|
|
Filing
48
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Directing respondents to file an answer to the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus on or before 10/13/2009; directing respondents to file a brief responsive to petitioner's 29 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment by 10/13/2009. Signed by Honorable James F. McClure, Jr on 9/11/09. (km, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
