Oliver v. Beard et al
Plaintiff: John R. Oliver
Defendant: Marirosa Lamas, Mr. Sowash, Franklin J. Tennis, Jeffrey A. Beard, Capparelle, Winkelman, Jed R. Jezek and John Doe
Case Number: 4:2008cv01473
Filed: August 6, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Williamsport Office
County: Centre
Presiding Judge: Thomas M. Blewitt
Presiding Judge: James F. McClure
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 28, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 9 in part re the reasoning for dismissing all defendants; granting plaintiff's motion 2 for leave to proceed in forma pauperis solely for the purpose of filing this action; dismissing all claims set f orth in Civil No. 08-1473, with the exception of plaintiff's First Amendment retaliation claim against defendant Sowash, which is dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies; denying as moot, plaintiff's motion 11 to appoint counsel; directing plaintiff to follow Rule 15 for future filings regarding the same defendants and the same issue; directing the clerk to close Civil No. 08-1473. Signed by Honorable James F. McClure, Jr on 10/28/08. (km, )
September 10, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; IT IS RECOMMENDED that the above case, 8-1473 be ordered consolidated with Plf's case 8-796, that plf's motion for ifp in Case 8-1473 (Doc 2) be granted solely for the purpose of filing this action, that case 8-14 73 be closed, and that all three of plf's cases proceed under Civil 4:CV-08-796. It is recommended that all of plf's claims, including his Eighth Amendment conditions of confinement claims, in his 8-1473 Complaint against all named Defts t herein, except for his First Amendment retaliation claim against deft Sowash and his First Amendment retaliation claim and access to court claim against unnamed prison staff, be dismissed based on the District Court's June l6, 2008 Order issued with respect to plf's 8-796 complaint. It is recommended that plf's First Amendment retaliation claim and access to court claim in case 8-1473 against unnamed prison staff be dismissed. It is recommended that plf's First Amendment re taliation claim against deft Sowash in case 8-1473 be dismissed without prejudice to re-file it after he exhausts his DOC administrative remedies. It is further recommended that the consolidated matter be remanded to the undersigned for further proc eedings as against only remaining deft Dr. Symmons and plf's Eighth Amendment denial of proper medical care claim with respect to his injuries sustained in his January 18, 2008 tray room fall. NOTICE; Exceptions to be filed within l0 days. Objections to R&R due by 9/29/2008Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Blewitt on 9/10/08. (jb, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Oliver v. Beard et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marirosa Lamas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mr. Sowash
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Franklin J. Tennis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeffrey A. Beard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Capparelle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Winkelman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jed R. Jezek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John R. Oliver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?