Reish v. The Pennsylvania State University et al
| John P. Reish |
| The Pennsylvania State University, Gegory Anderson and Susan Rutan |
| 4:2009cv01273 |
| July 3, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Williamsport Office |
| Centre |
| John E. Jones |
| Plaintiff |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 Job Discrimination (Age) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
94
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 70 Motion for Summary Judgment; 92 Report and Recommendations - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1) The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson (Doc. 92) is ADOPTED in its entirety. 2) The Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 70) is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff's federal claims. 3) Plaintiff's state law wage and hour claim is DISMISSED. 4) The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the file on this case. Signed by Honorable John E. Jones, III on 03/29/12. (pjr)
|
|
Filing
76
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - For the foregoing reasons, Reishs motion for discovery, which seeks the return of health care provider forms (Doc. 63 ) is DENIED but the defendants are directed to provide the plaintiff pursuant to Rule 26(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure with copies of any medical records they receive as a result of these authorizations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on July 5, 2011. (kjn )
|
|
Filing
57
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - For the foregoing reasons, Reishs motions for discovery, (Docs. 40 , 42 , 44 , 46 , 48 , 50 ) are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: 1. The motions for discovery filed as Docs. 40, 44, 46, 48 and 50 ar e DENIED. 2. The motion for discovery filed as Doc. 42, is GRANTED with respect to any performance evaluations and disciplinary records relating to Susan Rutan, Gregory Anderson and Steve Brisker employees from 2006 through 2010. To the extent that no such records exist, the Defendants shall certify the non-existence of these records, which shall constitute a complete response to this particular inquiry. In all other respects, the motion is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on May 24, 2011. (kjn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
