Pisarz v. PPL Corporation
| George J Pisarz, Jr |
| PPL Corporation |
| 4:2010cv01432 |
| July 9, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Williamsport Office |
| Montour |
| Yvette Kane |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
126
ORDER - In accordance with the MEMORANDUM filed of this same date, ECF No. 125, it is ORDERED that defendant PPL Corporation's motion to enforce settlement (12/28/12, ECF No. 85) is GRANTED; the case is dismissed with prejudice, and the Clerk is directed to close the case file. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 1/21/14. (km)
|
|
Filing
99
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: DENYING PPL Corp.'s motion 85 to enforce the parties' agreement to settle and discontinue plaintiff's civil action; scheduling an evidentiary hearing for 10/15/2013 10:00 AM in Williamsport - Courtroom 3 before Honorable Matthew W. Brann; directing the clerk to forward a copy of this order to the plaintiff by first class mail. (See order for details.)Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 4/19/13. (km)
|
|
Filing
26
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 1)Dft's 22 MOTION to Dismiss or Strike (in part) the Amended Complaint is GRANTED. 2)Pltf's ADA and ADEA claims rising out of events that occured before 5/28/08 are DISMISSED with PREJUDICE as untimely. 3)Pltf's PHRA claims arising out of events that occurred before 9/21/08, are DISMISSED with PREJUDICE as untimely. 4)Pltf's requests for compensatory and punitive damages under the ADEA and punitive damages under the PHRA are STRICKEN. Signed by Chief Judge Yvette Kane on Feb. 16, 2011. (sc)
|
|
Filing
16
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Dft's 8 MOTION to Dismiss and/or Strike (in part) the Complaint is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: 1)Pltf's retaliation claims under the ADA, ADEA, and PHRA are DISMISSED. 2) Pltf's ADA, ADEA, and PHRA claims arising out of Dft's failure to accomodate in 2007 are DISMISSED w/ prejudice as untimely. 3)Pltf shall submit an amdcmp that contains a more definite stmt (see order). 4)Pltf's requests for compensato ry and punitive damages under the ADEA and punitive damages under the PHRA are STRICKEN. 5)Dft's mtn to strike Pltf's request for compensatory and punitive damages pursuant to a retaliation claim under the ADA is DENIED AS MOOT. 6)Dft's mtn to strike Pltf's demand for a jury trial on his retaliation claim is DENIED AS MOOT. 7)The motion is otherwise DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Yvette Kane on Nov. 30, 2010. (sc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pisarz v. PPL Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: George J Pisarz, Jr | |
| Represented By: | Wayne A. Ely |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: PPL Corporation | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
