ROBINSON v. SOBINA et al
| Mark Maurice Robinson |
| Raymond J. Sobina and The attorney general of the state of pa |
| 4:2010cv01985 |
| September 23, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Williamsport Office |
| Outside State |
| DB |
| Malcolm Muir |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER :Respndent's motion to dismiss the petition as untiley is granted. Responsent's motion to continue briefing schedule pending motion to dismiss is dismissed as moot. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed as untimely under the statute of limitations. Petitioner's pending motion seeking immediate remedy for systematic, insidious obstruction of justice, motion for federal witness protection and emergency transfer and motion to amend are dismissed as moot. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.Signed by Honorable Malcolm Muir on 12/13/10. (bw, )
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER adopting 2 Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court and transferring the petition for a writ of habeas corpus of Mark Maurice Robinson to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d), forthwith. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster on 9/22/10. (map) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Western on 9/23/2010.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
