Miller v. Trometter et al
| Sean Miller |
| R. Collins, T. Defler, P. Damiter, Sharon Luquis, A. Kovalchik, S. K. Kephart and K. Trometter |
| 4:2011cv00811 |
| April 27, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Williamsport Office |
| Schuylkill |
| DB |
| Malcolm Muir |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: The motion for judgment on the pleadings, filed on behalf of Defendants Trometter and Luquis, (Doc. 32) is GRANTED. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Tr ometter and Luquis and against Plaintiff, Sean Miller. Defendant Damiter's motion for summary judgment, (Doc. 34), is GRANTED. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Damiter and against Plaintiff, Sean Miller. Defendants Collins, Kephart, De fler, and Kovalchik are DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. Any appeal taken from this order will be deemed frivolous, without probable cause, and not taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3).Signed by Honorable William J. Nealon on 10/9/14. (ga)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: The motion to dismiss, (Doc. 12), is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. (See Order for complete details)Signed by Honorable William J. Nealon on 11/27/12. (ga)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
